Several challenges with computers have taken place, perhaps among the best known are those with robots.

In particular the games won by computers against chess and go champions.

But did they actually won? No.
In fact, the machines had time to train.

They knew their opponents’ moves and playing habits.
They, the opponents, did not know the machines. Or rather “themselves.”

Because in a sense the robots mirrored some characteristics of their opponents.

So once these players played several games, they outplayed and won over the robots.

Or perhaps it should be said that they overcame themselves, and improved in their game.

Although a game with a robot is not the same as one with another person, it may still have been an opportunity to understand other techniques and get useful ideas.

But when all this is considered, one can see and summarize how in fact the only reason the robots gave an impression of victory was the difference in time and training.

They already had an advantage over their opponents, or so one might consider.

Their opponents constantly played with other people, and surely even on those occasions there must have been or will be victories and defeats on the part of both players.

One of the crucial factors is the lack of constant self-improvement and goodwill.

Throughout history-although computers were underdeveloped and champions prevailed in games, people relaxed.

Or rather computers have developed, people have been guided more by the convenience of comfort and immediacy, including those offered by machines.

And to top it all off, moral and therefore intelligence standards have deteriorated.

In fact, once we continue on this path, of disconnection from the innate good nature that is inherent in people, and what surrounds us — when we abandon our conscience — phenomena such as these can occur.